> Unknown origin?
Yes, they only say that “CAM/RBH strain and the wild-type wtF strain were kindly supplied by S. Niewiesk, Würzburg, Germany. The wild-type Chicago-1 strain was kindly supplied by D. Griffin, Baltimore, Md.” without any links to further information about how those supposed strains were originally isolated and their pathogenicity proven.
> gave them measles intranasally, the mice developed all of the symptoms of measles
They only say “natural respiratory route has a limited propagation”, which in my guess means that they were unsuccessful in propagating the supposed virus naturally. As for the brain injections they say that half of the mice died after they *injected* supposed viral sample coupled with a buffer solution *straight to their brain*. Duh. Obviously, they did not perform any controls of injecting only buffer solution to the brain, because it would show the same results as the supposed virus.
> then the scientists isolated the virus in the lung tissue of the mice
This is blatantly not true. They never did isolation, only did meaningless PCR sequencing.
Genetic sequencing is a separate large topic, but it also has a lot of problems. Regarding PCR testing used by virologists to determine viral infections, it is not a proper way to use this technology whatsoever. The creator of PCR, Kary Mullis (Nobel Prize winner if that matters to you) said it himself multiple times. And it definitely does not constitute in any way a proper substitute for actual isolation.
As expected the photo that you provided comes with the complete lack of any documentation regarding it. For all we know it can show a particle from a freshly created turd by the scientists that made the photo. It is absurd to use it in any serious manner whatsoever.
> The photo is not supposed to show the virus in isolation, it is to demonstrate that we have the ability to identify the specific virus as a distinct entity.
This is a complete nonsense. You cannot prove the existence of a virus (or identify it), without isolating it and properly proving that it is contagious. This is just getting silly, some random photo of some random particle is not a proof of anything. This is elementary school level logic, I don’t know how any grown man could argue otherwise in good faith.
It seems to me that the only one coping is yourself, and the only ones weaseling words are the supposed virologists who somehow manage to completely change definition of simple words and totally avoid doing any proper control experiments (which is unheard of in real science).
It is not me trying to prove some theory. It is all the people claiming that some microscopic independent particles exist that are able to make anyone sick. And they have never properly done it even a single time throughout the whole history. All the field of virology is just one gigantic fraudulent cope.
