#Bitcoin is a permissionless network, which means that individuals have the freedom to use it in any way they choose. While this is a fundamental aspect of Bitcoin, it is important to acknowledge that the way in which it is used can have both positive and negative implications. While opinions on what constitutes a "good" or "bad" use of Bitcoin may vary, it can be argued that engaging in experimental endeavors that expend valuable resources and result in a denial-of-service attack on the main chain, such as the use of ordinals and inscriptions, do not significantly contribute to the broader goal of Bitcoin adoption, namely, establishing sound money for everyone and separating money from the state. Therefore, such activities can be considered comparatively unproductive.

We should reserve layer 1 for settlement purposes and focus on building on top of it for other use cases. The ultimate value of Bitcoin lies in its ability to enable decentralized financial transactions and reduce reliance on centralized authorities, and any activity that undermines this objective could be, and maybe should be, considered detrimental.

Just a thought.