I don't want to say it's better... it's just better for our needs

The nip99 "classified ads" architecture is simpler and then we build the complexity into the extension of it... the other projects all agreed and so everyone can build whatever they like and still be interoperable

I've butchered the explanation but thats basically it in a nutshell

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

OK, read through the GammaMarkets suggestions. Looks to be some good stuff in there, although looks to add NIP-15 type stuff into NIP-99 which makes me wonder why “we” didn’t just update NIP-15 :-)

In summary it looks like using Collections as apposed to Stalls, improved shipping, reviews, NIP-17 vs NIP-04 DMs, and easier to hook in other payment gateways.

What happens to stall info such as description, banners etc.?

Where are we with the proposals in https://github.com/GammaMarkets/market-spec/blob/main/spec.md being agreed and merged in?

Which marketplace extension PR would be preferred nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s ? NIP-15 or NIP-99? From my research:

Plebeian (NIP-15 but moving to NIP-99)

ShopStr (NIP-99 and NIP-15)

LNbits (NIP-15)

Amethyst (NIP-99 and NIP-15)

Coracle (NIP-99)

Cypher Space (NIP-99)

Conduit (NIP-99)