A new Lordship List ?
As reported by Mike's excellent tool, the current list is as follows :
Rating
To
To Avg.
To Count
To Rank
Timestamp
Notes
1
justusranvier
1.9
13
337
Aug. 12, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
mthreat
1.3
8
832
Aug. 12, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
fluffypony
1.7
40
109
Aug. 12, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
dignork
1.4
17
363
Aug. 12, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
fabianb
1.7
12
402
Aug. 12, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
mod6
2.0
27
137
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
joecool
2
38
84
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
punkman
1.0
22
362
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
nanotube
3.6
205
2
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
davout
2.1
22
159
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
dub
1
7
1,050
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
artifexd
1.3
8
830
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
diametric
1
3
1,886
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
chetty
1.8
8
601
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
pete_dushenski
1.1
18
439
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
namworld
1.8
24
177
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
pankkake
0.9
14
703
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
apocalyptic
1.4
54
87
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
thestringpuller
1.9
15
297
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
mike_c
2
15
277
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
jurov
1.9
38
95
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
moiety
1.4
10
605
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
bingoboingo
1.7
35
119
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
nubbins`
1.7
27
163
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
thickasthieves
1.9
23
172
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
asciilifeform
2.1
21
173
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
ben_vulpes
1.7
30
148
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
mircea_popescu
2.0
112
16
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
1
kakobrekla
1.9
79
37
April 11, 2014
#bitcoin-assets
As far as substractions are concerned, I'd propose taking off justusranvier, fabianb, dub, joecool, nanotube, namworld, pankkake, apocalyptic, moiety, thickasthieves, broadly on the grounds that they don't seem specifically alligned with the Republic to any degree. Haven't been seen around in ages, aren't doing anything whatsoever - keeping them on the list probably bothers a lot of other people who would meet a similar bar but aren't actually on the list. Nanotube's exclusion specifically is important because he has an immense downstream list, and it happens a shade too often that people we don't know can self voice on the grounds of that relationship. None of these would, at least to my mind, be exclusions with prejudice, which is to mean exactly what it means in court : should they later find the time, interest and inclination to contribute substantially (as I have no doubt any actually could), there's going to be more revisions.
As far as additions are concerned, I'd propose cazalla (Qntra editor in chief.), danielpbarron (Lots and lots of logistics work.), trinque (Current deedbot maintainer.), mats (Lots of paralegal work, other open projects.), hanbot (MPOE-PR, F.MPIF manager etc.).
Comments welcome!
« A proper social site for the BDSM community
MP's very brief foray into a poetry forum »
Category: Bitcoin
Friday, 24 April, Year 7 d.Tr.