Replying to Avatar Hanshan

so youre criticism of tail emission is that it should be *higher? to incentivize miners? doesn't that depend on the purchasing power of the unit?

and isn't the whole point to avoid the necessity of relying exclusively on fees?

I'm just not clear what you mean.
Avatar
goatmeal 5d ago

tail emission is better than nothing but I don't feel certain it's going to be good enough.

I like the idea of burning fees and giving block producers only new coins

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Hanshan 5d ago

yeah I feel ya

it's obvious that something is needed, but whether it's "good enough" or not depends on specifics that we can't know.

therefore

Avatar
Daedalus 5d ago

Yeah it's a good idea. There's been some proposals for this but nothing too concrete. I like the ETH burn and mint system but dislike that the supply increase rate isn't fixed like Monero's. There's a middle ground here surely.