Has anyone noticed that Bitvmv2 has been putting abritary data into the UTXO set rather than OP Return like Casey and his ordinals. Not a fan of Lukes 83 byte cap limit filters as this introduces "permission" into a permissionless network. But can't help but wonder why everyone are so focused on arbitary data on the OP Return when recent activity has mainly been Bitvmv2. These arguments are best had at bitdevs 🧡

The real concern IMHO as stated by LaurentMT:

"Concerns about jpeg and ordinals spamming the Bitcoin blockchain are a distraction.

You should be concerned about a state-backed usd coin using the Bitcoin blockchain as its data availability layer and outpricing the monetary use of bitcoin."

🤗