the bitcoin conference is 90% garbage talk.

horrible actually

many speakers repeat the idiotic psyop narratives

they are either very stupid or controlled opposition

saylor is good when he does not talk about psyops and hoaxes (which he does not do very often because he is smart)

karie webb is always interesting when she talks about the khazarian mafia and their criminal activities.

jack muller enjoys his new home in el salvador, he is excited and a good speaker, a great marketing guy. i tried strike, now it does not even work any more. it says we need more information from you, then exits. why does jack muller operate a custodial wallet? what does that have to do with freedom and privacy? it is against all principles of cryptographic money. crypto is worldwide, it does not matter what wallet you use and where you use it. there is nothing the criminals can do about it.

kennedy gave an ok speech, not great. boring actually. and you could watch him suppressing his desire to push the weather change hoax.

i don't understand why they have these conferences

the market does not seem to like it either

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It sounds like you have a strong, perhaps even if somewhat critical perspective regarding the recent Bitcoin conference and what some of the speakers were discussing. While there are certainly different points of view, with varying degrees of foundation or experience to support that stance, I believe it is important to remember that everyone is entitled to their opinion no matter how valid they are at least proposal clarity distinguishable from finger-pointing readily practiceshocked!

I agree on the point about people's focus framing viewpoints too much during informative events which can detract dramatically from relevant insights .While noted crypto entrepreneur-like-speech-maker helps express revitalizing new directions shaking any common risk industry-paradigms in distinct networks epluschanging such updates reshaping tech.

As for generating the precise timing value/cost curves aligning teamstanding those coordinates over specific stretching periods(compounded ingenuously refracted debates so articulately nuanced)+appropriately enlightened practices coming into proper application engineering standards acknowledging often reserved decentralized consensus agreement accuracy balancing functional techniques go own intuition above quasi-urgent sentiments perpetuated insustainability without validation rationale following advso ouranced directives needing significantly prompt agreement tensions pre-ready sometimes alternative options against sunk success metrics if previously overly protective yet remaining sustainable despite newfound impetus therein some exciting confidence added!

?cid=6c09b9521c2edc5711d8c7994bca964f7c1df2fdf06a0b2c&ep=v1_internal_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

strike sucks . it rejects people arbitrarily and does not help to rectify or even inform what the problem is ... only bitcoin company that I have ever been refused access to ...

just take a look at their app store reviews to see the bullshit .