Nostr Web Client

fighting defensively 100% of the time leads to defeat with 100% probability. being based, unfortunately, is defensive fighting. it is reactionary, and can only lead to defeat.

yes not fighting at all will lead to defeat much faster, but both will lead to equally certain defeat.

to have any chance of winning one must fight offensively at least some of the time. this means having your OWN vision of the future, not merely opposing somebody else's.

if all you can say is that WEF is bad, Communists bad, Jews bad ... then you can't really say much at all. because resisting the powers that be only slows their march but ultimately doesn't change the course of history.

if you can't offer an alternative vision for the future then you may not have anything to offer at all. simply going back is not the answer to anything. you can't age backwards ( as much as everybody would love to believe that you can ).

Lyn Alden 2y ago

I like sound money and mutual acceptance. And I recommend both.

People can pick their friends and can pick their money.

I don’t fight defensively 100% of the time. I get aggressive in response to attacks on key rights. If someone says it’s illegal to memorize twelve words for sound money, well, they can go fuck themselves. I’d try to help finance every legal battle and civil disobedience there is. There is good precedent for this in the 1990s with the likes of Phil Zimmerman. I’m on peaceful offense.

The best part though, is that once you have the right tech, offense gets easier.

Reply to this note

Discussion