Nostr Web Client

I just take it as proof that I'm part of the remnant at this point.

Not approving of things that God calls an abomination is just such a low bar. I don't understand how these people can call themselves Christians. This is not even the rainbow mafia, this is church people signing up to be on the side that's against God because they think it's virtuous to tolerate faggots and child molesters.

Ωmega 2y ago

They bought into the "love your enemies" line as also meaning to love God's enemies and all wickedness.

If I really wanted to get schizo about it I have a theory that this stuff really kicked off at the turn of the 20th century when "revivals" erupted all over the place with speaking in tongues and running up and down, hooping and hollering and acting like animals became acceptable in service. This birthed the pentecostal church which then birthed the charismatic which birthed the current NAR.

Every one got more and more into this stuff and claimed all sorts of wild things. Boiled down they are all based on emotion. You go to church get "struck by the spirit" and get an emotional high and then come back Sunday for another high. All this is pushed with rhythmic music to hype you up. Emotional dependency lead to acceptance of emotional appeals from outside the church, i.e. faggots.

I grew up as pentecostal and I felt bad because I never really experienced that "struck" thing. Was I touched emotionally sometimes? Sure, but it was few and far in-between and that generally was during preaching as I reflected on what was done for a wretch such as myself. Anyway back to the point, in some circles you were looked down upon if you never got struck.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Watcher of Flames 2y ago

Yeah I grew up pentecostal too

What's interesting though is that this acceptance of faggotry is going on in virtually every denomination, but it occurs through different paths based on the different social tendencies of each. I agree with you about the general path in pentecostalism, but now the argument is "God can save anyone with any sin, and it would be unloving to tell them to much of the truth about LGBT sin." Where, in Lutheranism, excess focus on scholasticism causes them to come to the same place of "we must tolerate the gays", but not through the emotional place of the pentecostals but through some kind of strange logic: "we should focus more on the gospel and less on the law."

To me this is proof that the spirit of the age, demonic influence is at work in multiple denominations through false christians to bring about the same result in different ways.

Simply look at catholicism and orthodoxy, they also have factions pushing this stuff.