Be honest #[3] have you tried, or do you know absolutely anything about Nano?
Theoretically, you should absolutely love it.
Discussion
That's a really stupid way of you arguing and baiting me and you should not force people to talk about things they are absolutely not interested in.
Yes, I've read the whitepaper, I know what a DAG is, I know the lattice, I know the compromises and I am not interested in your shitcoin.
Not an argument at all.
I'm genuinely curious what your concerns with it are.
What are the compromises?
And what is a "shitcoin"? What is your qualification for calling something a shitcoin?
You’re not interested. You’re here to troll then act indignant when people respond in a way that could be perceived as negative.
I am indeed very interested.
If someone has strong arguments against it, I want to know what they are.
I'm waiting for the next alts rally to divest myself of them. I'm mostly concerned with their price versus BTC, and I'm not sure when might be best to make the swap.
Nano is not gonna happen bro. Let it go
Why not? What are its faults?
Lack of security, lack of decentralization, lack of adoption.
The base layer should be as sound as it gets, hence bitcoin only.
> Lack of security
What exactly do you mean by this?
Nano has instant deterministic finality with far better security than the probabilistic finality of Bitcoin.'
Once a node sees quorum voting weight to determine a transaction block is valid, which occurs in about half a second, it cements the block as final and will not reverse it, no matter how much voting weight any other node can obtain.
Do you mean something else?
> lack of decentralization
Nano's lack of monetary incentives means that both node operators and users are directly incentivized to decentralize as much as possible. Despite its relatively low market cap, Nah has already achieved better operational decentralization than Bitcoin, with a Nakamoto Coefficient of about 10, compared to Bitcoin's NC of 2-3.
Nano has far greater potential for decentralization and resistance to seizure and censorship than Bitcoin.
> lack of adoption
Adoption / network effect is an emergent property of utility and demand, it is not inherent to the technology. It only comes with time.
> The base layer should be as sound as it gets, hence bitcoin only.
And yet Nano is even more sound than Bitcoin in just about every fundamental way. Why reject this?
And thank you for giving me a real response.
You're on the wrong platform. This is a #Bitcoin platform. Nobody is tipping people in Nano here.
