Replying to Avatar Dikaios1517

Had an interesting discussion with a good friend of mine last night. He was opining on how terrible it is that culture has moved away from physical media, such as printed books, newspapers, comic books, etc.

To some extent I agree with him. I very much enjoy sitting down with a physical book more than an ebook. However, as I mentioned to another nostrich earlier today, there are distinct advantages to digital literature, especially for reference materials. For instance, I have a full set of hard-cover Calvin Commentaries that was gifted to me early on as I pursued ministry. I have no room for them in my current rental. They are sitting in a box in my storage unit. However, I am constantly referencing the digital versions of this commentary series and many others that I would NEVER be able to justify buying to put on a bookshelf in my home.

That said, one criticism of digital literature struck home for me. He mentioned that the digital versions of many books appear to be redacted or altered. Digital media, especially when housed by centralized services such as Amazon, is not trustworthy, as it is trivial to modify in ways the author did not intend.

Then I blew his mind.

Project #Alexandria changes all this. When authors can cryptographically sign their publications, digital literature suddenly becomes MORE trustworthy than printed literature. You know that absolutely nothing about the publication has been altered since the author signed it. Not a single punctuation mark.

#Nostr changes everything.

I like ebooks when I literally just want to read the book. (I would note there is also the open-source ePub standard).

Where I can really appreciate physical book media is when it's and artistically made edition, especially an art book or coffee table book.

I'll own "special editions" of books that are really important to me... Or old dog-eared copies that I've had for decades.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.