Subnostr

I think this reflects well on both Carlson & Milei.

Milei comes across as having exposure to libertarian thought (equality before the law, non-aggression) but also deeper familiarity (eg cogent references to multiple of Hayek's works)

If Milei is a WEF double agent he's indistinguishable from the real thing.

nostr:nevent1qqs8p7ehnvrq29ga0hxzmmaz35v3t0xl588jhcrt6kg5v8jhpmant6cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzqq24xuav0xmllv84smp7dqukl85z63hh4lnszm2xakw2g6aruxldqvzqqqqqqyk2neyz

Mark Camper 2y ago

You liked the conversation? 👀

Utterly failed to meet the hype to me.

Tucker pushed his script and went through the checklist of his questions without listening to and engaging with the answers. He was a poor partner for the conversation here. Especially if his point was to showcase to the Americans the dangers of the socialistic progression through welfare handouts to hyperinflationary collapse.

Closing out with the question put in doubt whether the police would protect Milei against rioters if he wins was weird. Reminded me of his question to Trump whether he things he would get assassinated.

Overall, ingenuine from both sides. I should have done something more productive than listening to it. 😐

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Studio 3.14 Official 2y ago

I did like it. The things Milei spoke of are parallels to me of things happening in the USA. It was interesting to hear him speak.

I don't mind that Tucker went through a list because I wasn't listening to hear his thoughts. I was listening to hear Javier.

As far as the end goes. He said exactly what he meant. He will keep fighting no matter and might die by doing so but he is ok with that because the work still needs done.

Better to die free than live on your knees