Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Derek Ross

I don't think it's about who you know or your amount of reach. I don't believe that for one second.

OpenSats seems to mostly fund developers and not so much development of specific projects. There may be a couple outliers here, but the majority of them seem to be funding existing work, not funding companies or future plans.

i.e. I built this cool thing and I'd love to continue to do this. I need money to continue.

I haven't seen your plans, but based on what they seem to fund and speaking with some board members in an information gathering way, it sounds like reduction of scope seems par for the course.

Maybe reduce to bare minimum and both you and Fishcake both apply individually for your work?

Avatar
Nice and Kind Vic 1y ago

More transparency from nostr:npub10pensatlcfwktnvjjw2dtem38n6rvw8g6fv73h84cuacxn4c28eqyfn34f on this whole process would help.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Egge 1y ago

There is this: https://opensats.org/selection

Avatar
Nice and Kind Vic 1y ago

That is not transparency

Avatar
liminal 🦠 1y ago

Transparency in the decision process is what you're hinting at?

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

if the donors have transparency then that's all that matters

getting free money attracts whiny bitches so there's that

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed