yeah, as soon as it became clear to me understanding it, now i understand how it can be defended

for ecash, this means being able to exchange tokens to randos without risk of being rugged, and i think the ecash scheme allows this, but nobody so far has pointed out or talked about the need for this change mixing, even though it's intuitive

coins are fungible, but messages are not, so messages can't benefit from this, but ecash can

the ecash promoters need to get some cans of whoop ass for making their claims of anonymity over this

and build fucking change exchanges, this is totally doable

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

also, change exchanges have a problem of you can't exchange change without correlating the fucking issuer