Pros and cons of Gleason's bridges (aka network effect 101)

Pros:

* Good example of deep state glowie bullshit when you need an example to point at

Cons:

* My transmitting reach is reduced because some of the nostr users who don't find my posts are ones that would if it weren't for bridge spam they'd have to dig through

* My receiving reach is reduced because some of the good npubs whose posts I don't find are ones I would if it weren't for bridge spam I'd have to dig through

* My transmitting reach is reduced because some of the non nostr users who would be drawn to my posts are people who would use nostr if their testing of nostr found as much more usefulness as nostr would have without the bridge spam

* My receiving reach is reduced because some of the non nostr users who would make good posts are people who would use nostr and show up on my screen if their testing of nostr found as much more usefulness as nostr would have without the bridge spam

* My transmitting reach is reduced because some of the non nostr users who would be drawn to my posts are people who would use nostr if other people's testing found nostr useful enough for them to be on nostr resulting in more activity overall

* My receiving reach is reduced because some of the non nostr users who would make good posts are people who would use nostr if other people's testing found nostr useful enough for them to be on nostr resulting in more activity overall

* My transmitting reach is reduced because most people just want to use whatever app they've tried and found enough engagement on, and thus making Bluesky and Mastodon more engaging is strengthening their appeal to users and delaying or preventing movement to nostr, and meanwhile people on Bluesky and Mastodon are less likely to see my posts since those platforms are more centralized

* My receiving reach is reduced because most people just want to use whatever app they've tried and found enough engagement on, and thus making Bluesky and Mastodon more engaging is strengthening their appeal to users and delaying or preventing movement to nostr, and meanwhile people on Bluesky and Mastodon are less capable of making worthwhile posts for me to see because they're less likely to see my posts in return

Condensed version (shorter but less clear)

Pros and cons of Gleason's bridges

Pros:

* Good example of deep state glowie bullshit when you need an example to point at

Cons:

* My reach is reduced because some of the nostr users who aren't finding my posts, or making posts I find, would be a different story if it weren't for bridge spam we'd have to dig through

* My reach is reduced because some of the non nostr users who would make good posts or find mine if they were here, aren't, but would be if their own testing of nostr found it as useful as it would be without bridge spam

* My reach is reduced because some of the non nostr users who would make good posts or be drawn to mine if they were here, aren't, because other people that would make this place active enough for them left when their testing found nostr as useless as bridge spam makes it

* My reach is reduced because most people just want to use whatever app they've tried and found enough engagement on, and thus making Bluesky and Mastodon more engaging is strengthening their appeal to users and delaying or preventing movement to nostr, and meanwhile people on Bluesky and Mastodon are less likely to see my posts since those platforms are more centralized, and their lower likelihood of seeing my posts also makes it less worthwhile for me to see their posts

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Love to see what you can code up. Let’s build the futu… oh wait.

Still waiting for you to follow up here if you're actually capable of exchanging words and not just spamming

nostr:note1nq5r6zc3t5g0yfr0mhx797p37ek3e2e6z5xuct2ml9ndg5du4pnsdta8wl

Good nostr:note1hrs6947q7rf0ysp638f6pw5d9g5enzl32qr5uj4at2p5upt0qufqrhdnru