I am always fascinated by the made up rules of group managers and moderators. Which rules enables successful communities? Which rules make members go away? There is so much to learn from them.

Clear rules and well-known power structructures help members self-select into communities they like. Each community is on itself is a product that somebody is carefully managing. Tools to help mods manage all conversations are essential to the existence of the community.

For instance, one reddit community I participate just added a **no volume posting**: "Please limit your posts to no more than 3 per day. If you make a series of posts in a short period of time, you may have some of them removed. Feel free to re-post the removed posts another day in the future."

Another community just completely banned off-topic posts: "We are not here to make friends and discuss each other business, we are here to learn how to cook and discuss our kitchen experiments with the broader internet. Every other post will be deleted"

That's beautiful. It sets the pace for what the mod hopes is an acceptable human interaction with technology. It makes people focus in posting just the things that matter the most. And the technology must be there to help them enforce those rules.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Every group has their season. Wait long enough & it devolves into rando posts & low engagement…

The churn of new users to engaged users is everything!!!

that said better tech / AI … maybe different

It depends. Reddit communities around specific things (Cities/OSs/Languages) are quite sticky.

I think whatever good project has its lifecycle. Therefore it is ok for a community to die. When it is a community, for a topic, that looses intrest. Or for an event. It is great when there are things not meant to stay for infinity.

Would be great when companies do this too. Stick to what they are built for and vanish, when the problem is solved well.

A nice compromise I have seen is discussion boards that have sub-boards with different rules. There is often the main board, a board for new people to say hi and one for off-topic discussions. Reddit doesn't support this functionality directly, but I have seen mods set up sister subs for off-topic or less serious discussions.

I frankly don't know if that is a good idea. Sure, it's nice if people get to know each other, but it distracts the community from the discussion everyone is there for.

I think it does the opposite. It allows people to have random conversations out of the way without detracting from the on-topic discussions. It also gives the modes options other than the ban-hammer. Rather than telling people they can't say certain things, you just ask them to take their discussion where people are interested in it. Good boards (not Reddit) allow mods to move threads to more appropriate sub-boards instead of just deleting or locking them. The additional scope for organizing discussions allows more people to participate.

well defined personal boundaries and well defined group boundaries are sound psychologically. Without them, things are a mess. 🤙😇

What I also find interesting is how subtle constraints/choices made by the broader platform can have rippling impacts on things. Like what sets of tools mods have, the number of live participants on a “stage” at a time..