Bitcoin never was what it claimed to be if that's the case. It's far more naive to think hard money wouldn't attract everyone. Did you think amazing technology was just going to be ignored forever? Traditional finance wouldn't use it? You're applying a purity test for use of something that was designed to be open to everyone, purity tests be damned. You're imposing your world view onto Bitcoin. Sorry, but that never was the reality of the thing. This stuff is a test for Bitcoin, in my opinion. And not everyone has the same views we do (I probably agree with you on a lot of stuff).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

cool story bro 👍

Lol

nobody said legacy finance wasn't going to come in.

its just pathetic y'all simp for it and rationalize it as winning.

Blah blah blah. Congratulating someone for filling a market space isn't simping. It's called being an adult. I don't have to buy the shit if I don't agree with it (I won't). Someone was going to do it. It might as well be a guy who is on my side overall. You're simping for a make believe ideology that isn't going to get any of us anywhere. This is the real world, not an ideological vacuum where only your principles exist.

that ideology is called cypherpunk son

and its why we have Bitcoin in the first place