I’m not sure on the correct phrasing here,

Protected implies there is a legal framework to forbid other legal framework from infringing… “hate speech” requires a legal framework to define what that is, and there is a debate if it is a thing at all.

There is nothing stopping a relay from complying with a certain legal system that has defined it, resistance is probably a good term here, as it’s not protected, in that the relay that does comply, is still a nostr relay. All speech is engineered to be resistant to censorship due to the diversity and independence of relays and clients.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

meaning if the relay is in the US, it’s legally protected speech, the government can’t prevent the relay from broadcasting speech that some group considers hate speech, so jurisdictional arbitrage is a good to have

that’s “on US”… not “on nostr”

“on nostr” doesn’t exist

yet that’s how you started the phrasing of this conversation…

sorry, it exist on my nostr