I'm also of the opinion that peaceful protest is more inherently noble, and that it therefore is a sacrifice that resonates more deeply, with those who witness it. It's a form of martyrdom.
Would Jesus have been more effective with a bunch of guns, instead of a cross? 🤔 Doubt.
Would the founding fathers on the US have been able to create a republic based on human rights and the rule of law had they been unarmed? Doubtful.
I’m dubious of extrapolating Jesus’ teachings to matters of state and politics. If everyone were enlightened, willing to be martyrs rather than complying, maybe. But much more likely they’d just be enslaved.
Hunger strikes and sit-ins against the British Empire didn't become effective until they were broadcast live. Information is the best weapon, now.
Information, yes, but backed by force if it’s ignored.
All governments rule at the consent of the governed.
“Consent” can be coerced which is why the 2nd A was deemed important enough to be put in the Bill of Rights, right after free speech.
Please do not confuse the Constitution, which was designed to limit the power of the federal government, with some general call to violent anarchy.
That’s a a non-sequitur. We’re talking about whether governments necessarily govern via consent. The founders thought otherwise which is why they expressly prohibited theirs from taking away your guns.
