⚡️🇺🇸 RESUME - The Known Chronology of the Charlie Kirk Assassination
➥ 1) Designated fake shooters with pellet guns and other distractions
➥ 2) 200 yard shot clear to the neck
➥ 3) No chance of survival for Charlie
➥ 4) Police arrested two fake shooters and let them go later.
➥ 5) Shooter ran away, while everyone was focused on the fake shooters arrest
This is professional, who is behind this? #asknostr
🎯
⚡️🔎 THEORY - Several theories are beginning to emerge. From what I understand ⤵︎
➥ "The observers may have given the signal to shoot".
➥ "They could have been waiting for the right moment to make a political point, they waited for the moment when Charlie would talk about gun violence.
Attached is the video of the potential signal + detailed explanation of a sniper shot.
https://blossom.primal.net/f73da7e56a6c01e3b279afe49e84350f09b33671ce8d3b630458992639e00332.mp4
I’m curious about the fake shooters…are they not accomplices? Why would anyone have a fake gun otherwise?
It's actually common, I think guns are generally expensive and a pellet gun probably has the same effect (visually) but it's also fuckoff silly because, you know, real guns.
I saw these cops shoot this black guy and he had a pellet gun so I mean lol
That’s crazy. There’s no way I would risk my life having a fake gun at an event like this
Fake news about fake gun holders
Soros foundation
