Yes they intentionally put the 300kb limit & expected it to be raised in the future… where server farms are only ones who kept the blockchain fully archived…
Discussion
Wasn’t it 1MB?
When you look at bcash or bsv, are you thinking we should fix bitcoin by bringing those big blocks here too?
No the 1mb limit was supposed to be temporary & was set in place during Segwit.
Scaling on chain works.
I was never a "small blocker"
No, Satoshi set the 1 MB size on 15 July 2010, many years before segwit. Link below.
The big blockers had their priorities reversed. They were ok with centralizing the chain permanently to make transactions cheaper temporarily.
If you are still a big blocker, perhaps you would find your ideological home with either bcash or bsv. Transactions are definitely cheap over there.
Yes satoshi wanted to raise the blocksize early on thank you & in that exact link it clearly says it was activated during the UASF which was Segwit…
I think you should read it more closely. It says “enforced” not activated. That’s because it was already active in July 2010 when the code was checked in. The enforcement in Aug 2017 was the point of the UASF … to force the big blockers into a chain split.
Did you think you “got me”? 😂
Sometimes I get stuff wrong, but I didn’t this time.