utxos with different histories are nonfungible by definition
Discussion
People will attach whatever history they want to tokens. That doesn't make them any less fungable. 1 sat is still 1 sat... It only matter to th individuals perception of the historical context. Do you think I give a shit if a has an inscription or not? Do you think the vendor selling goods cares? No. They don't. nostr:nprofile1qqs2gndun24r2utk5l20tscsdprw5zttvm0qk58w8xhl2ja2kmzt7jcpvemhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0dec82c33x5ehsmt90q6ry7p5vd5xge3hx5mksupnwym857rpvaukk6m9dvmhqer8wa6hwepsxu6rjd35v34hj6rp89ensvnj096ns0mzwfhkzerrv9ehg0t5wf6k2qg7waehxw309ahx7um5wgkkgetk9emk2mrvdaexgetj9ehx2ap0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsxs66av is not going to sell me some for less bitcoin because I have some rare sats.
I'm not talking about inscriptions.
and it doesn't matter what your tx counterparty thinks either.
the utxos have different histories.
therefore they are not fungibile.
because that's what fungibility is.
Some people are gonna get rekt on those naritives, but it won't be me.
Long term, I doubt there's a wide market for that kind of thing even if some are actually worth a lot
I hope i obtain and spend rArE saTs without even knowing it
my version of ordinals counts every sat as a rare sat
Zapped you 7 ultra-rares
Nothing compared to my 58 legendary sats!
Where have you been?! And semi has his PFP again? Is this a revival of nostr?
