nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4sppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucn89ur9eu8h would say that it is quite feasible when the block template is owned by one large entity, while everyone sells their hashes to them via fpps.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Until they stop selling.

Most of the hashrate is not backed by bitcoin ideology. These people are corporate suites.

It's not ideology.

51% attack means bitcoin is dead and with it the investments of the miners.

The miners would have to be super retarded to allow that.

Again, as long as nothing specifically bad happens, there's no problem.

You're not spraying water on your house when it's not on fire.

Once there's an actual attack going on then we'll see.

Centralized banks are fine as long as nothing bad happens.