Do you truly hold the opinion that only code contributors should get to decide how bitcoin is shaped into the future? Like the huge number of people that are invested in it and have helped bitcoin achieve its current valuation are just completely disposable and any dev that submits code is instantly more correct and has truer and higher virtues and couldn't possibly be wrong about anything?
You might be bloody clever JB, but you're proving that does not automatically make you wise.
yes I believe that, because it's clear if you haven't looked at the code you are likely dumb af and shouldn't have an opinion on how the code should be structured
Yep, just like only the best Formula 1 drivers and jet pilots ever get to sit in the hot seat. Never mind that fact that 99+% of hoomans never get a chance to see if they have what it takes.
No doubt you had absolutely no cultural or class privilege that helped present to you the opportunities to become the coder you are.
To state that anyone that doesn't currently code is dumb AF is ignorant beyond belief.
I don't have an opinion how the code is structured. But every Bitcoiner that has paid real world blood and sweat to buy into this asset (where the fuck to you think the value comes from?) and intends to keep holding it deserves an opinion on how code changes effect how bitcoin functions. I, like many of us, bought into it well before this change was proposed.
