What worries me is that it can be easily instigated again by those with deep pockets.
I would love to hear why that would not be the case.
What worries me is that it can be easily instigated again by those with deep pockets.
I would love to hear why that would not be the case.
It's like the zapathon stress testing lightning but costs more than zaps.
Ultimately it highlights the need to put more corn on lightning to ride out high fee scenarios.
Feels like Lightning could take some of load off Bitcoin but it’s feels like Bitcoin should be strengthened to protect against this kind of attack.