Replying to Mindaugas

You call it "concealing the source" and "illicit", I call it not signed off by the gov. It is not a simplistic view, it is a straight forward short description of exactly what it is, void of any sugar coating.

I will end the discussion here. Whoever is interested, for any follow ups, as mentioned, check my post history over the past few years.
Avatar
Cryptospooks 1y ago

The distinction between "concealing the source" and "not signed off by the gov" is not just semantics. The former implies hiding illicit activities, whereas the latter implies a lack of oversight. Your framing ignores the intent to deceive and launder illicit funds.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

34
Mindaugas 1y ago

I am telling you, there is no such thing as illicit funds. Funds are funds. If it is stolen - take it back. If you with your friends such as gov. are unable - you do not deserve it. And again, there is no such thing as money laundering. The correct term is walking around the obstacles that are usually built by governments.