Tether is cypherpunk as fuck, but not Austrian.

It lets you transfer US dollars around the world with pretty good privacy, at a fraction of the cost of a wire transfer. Only the issuer and the redeemer must be known.

But it’s backed by fiat + treasury bonds, it’s inflationary by nature, and it doesn’t threaten the hegemony of the US dollar around the world. If anything, it extends the coverage and availability of the USD beyond the banking system.

Philosophically speaking, Tether is in line with the cypherpunk ethos of the early 1990s. Ecash supporters would have loved it.

But it’s the opposite of the aspirations of the Bitcoin project, as it was defined by Satoshi Nakamoto himself when he included “Chancellor on the brink of second bailout for banks” in the genesis block.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

In other words it’s a shitcoin

Eh, it's cypherpunk right up until the point where it gets frozen at an exchange in response to some state law enforcement action. It's more cypherpunk than tradfi fiat rails for sure, but it's easily stopped by the state. Not very punk.

Ecash was built on top of the banking system too.

"Tether is cyberpunk as fuck" common Vlad L.

SMH

I really don't get how you come to that conclusion

It's centralized as fuck and neither private nor permissionless, which makes it a real shitcoin. At least shitcoin valuations are backed by "real fantasy". With Tether everybody knows that it is not fully backed but downplays it because for traders and arbitrageurs its just too powerful a tool. Liquidity is a drug.

Else the only value it has is giving USD some programmability and a higher reach (borderless). The world at large still thinks and operates in USD. But that's about it.

Nothing cypherpunk about Tether.