The state of top peer-reviewed journals like The Lancet:

"Rather than even allow a proper response to a flawed study, they have instead attacked their critics, accusing them of being spreaders of misinformation and โ€˜anti-vaxxers.'"

"It is now fair to conclude that not a single major peer-reviewed study claiming vaccine effectiveness and/or safety can be trusted to be valid."

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-lancet-heavily-redact-their-response

https://nostr.build/i/nostr.build_86aff9ca3417f38de56f9068d79216e41cdcab6f8f4a73bfb73c29fa251fdfa9.webp

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Never forget that during the height of the scamdemic, The Lancet was more than happy to publish a paper written by a porn actress and a sci fi writer which was used to justify a global ban on one of the most effective treatments for covid.

In our house The Lancet has always been cringe AF.

And the lead-based paint is chipping off PubMed now.

The Lancet also published the Peter Daszak -inspired letter calling lab leak a conspiracy theory.