Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Vitor Pamplona

You are only naming two options for the sake of societal outcomes: eggs are humans or eggs are not humans. I am saying that there is a third: it's neither. You can't label them human life because there is no agreed definition for when a human life begins. And if we can't agree on an global, undeniable, objective truth, which I truly think it is impossible to define in this case, I will always side with the side that gives freedom to individuals to make the call on a case by case basis. In this case, the freedom goes to the mother as the only human with enough skin in the game to decide and suffer with the decision forever.

Avatar
promisedland 5mo ago

I don't think it's impossible to define when a life begins, or is even that controversial. How about the simple rule of "the point after which an abortion is necessary to prevent birth." Why would you have to abort something that is not alive?

Also weird to call being a parent suffering forever, especially when adoption exists.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.