Talking with a friend of mine (lawyer) about nip79 he pointed this
"Clearly establish in the contract terms which jurisdiction will be applicable in case of disputes. This reduces ambiguity and provides certainty to all parties involved"
Discussion
This could work?
```json
{
"kind": 900,
"created_at": "[Creation Timestamp]",
"content": "[Content in Markdown]",
"tags": [
["title", "
["summary", "
["valid_from", "Timestamp"], // Optional: Start date of the contract
["valid_to", "Timestamp"], // Optional: End date of the contract
["L", "nostr_contracts"],
["l", "Contract", "nostr_contracts"], // One could use "Covenant", "Agreement", or another type according to your specifications.
["p", "party", "
["p", "party", "
["p", "party", "
["expiration", "
["jurisdiction", {
"country": "USA",
"state": "California",
"city": "San Francisco",
"court": "Superior Court of California"
}]
],
"pubkey": "[Signer's Public Key]",
"id": "[Event ID]",
}
```