Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar CypherKnight777

Chaumian ecash requires more trust in a single party (e.g. a Cashu mint) while blockchain smart contracts can be designed to decentralize trust and distribute it to the entire network. The question is whether or not SimpleX Chat ltd. will remain a trusted party for other reasons. If the payment system can be made fully trustless, the blockchain approach has merit. Otherwise it'll be an unnecessary complication.

There's no straightforward way to resell these vouchers if I'm understanding the proposed system correctly, so they aren't useful as an investment and won't serve to raise capital for anyone.

I'm not sure this is the best solution. It does seem to solve the stated problems, but it's difficult for a lot of users to understand what it solves and why.

Avatar
SimpleX Chat 1mo ago

Exactly right. Our goal is to build a trustless system here, and eventually make network governance trustless as well.

If you looked at the preliminary design doc you can see that e-cash emerges at a point of Community Credit to operator credit conversion (so only micropayments or "change" depend on e-cash), but we might be able to remove this extra-layer based on the current design process evolution.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.