None of this should be handled by government.

Up until around the late 19th century, it was charity - largely through churches - that took care of those who could not support themselves, for all the various reasons universal to fallen mankind.

And, no, I’m not suggesting we shift funding from XYZ program to churches and not-for-profits. (And I applaud VP Vance for calling our own bishops out of running this game for the last 50+ years).

We - each, individually - need to put our money where our mouths and hearts are.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It was primarily taken care of by families, charities stepped in to fill the void where needed. In Australia for example we had “granny flats” where a small detached unit was put on the block so the oldies could live with the working age family unit.

This is still the case in Asia where parents don’t kick the kids out of home at 18 and their houses are designed for multi level living.

It needs to return to the family rather than the Government being ersatz parents for people who depend on them their entire lives and thus effectively never grow up.

Yes. Family first is exactly what is needed. Would take care of most.