There are perfectly reasonable things to point to as likely causes for the prior bull runs which coincided with the years following the halving that just don't go on in perpetuity. The two big ones are the halving itself (reducing in effect exponentially with each epoch) and the debt refinancing cycle, as the 3-5 year corporate debt cycle got largely synchronized in 2008 when rates dropped to zero (which impacted broader liquidity with a heartbeat averaging around those 4 year periods).

At this point 95% of coins have been issued, while institutional buying has turned new supply all but undetectable. Meanwhile the post COVID turbulence around interest rates has somewhat broken that side of things.

I'm not saying we're going up constantly here, so I don't like the supercycle narrative as it seems reductionist. But the four year cycle seems to draw a trend from too few data points, on top of those points being seen to have been caused by factors that don't apply.

Throw in the changes to the eSLR the other day and the idea of an impending bear market seems akin to flat Earth dogma.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I understand the reasons that could break the 4 year cycle but until it is invalidated it still holds true, so far the price action is consistent with a 4 year cycle so it is holding up. There is no dogma to it is based on price and structure.

You're saying its a wave; I'm saying its a particle.

Guess there's some of both if we allow for silly human superstitious pattern recognition to self fulfill. I'll take the sale anyway, but I'm not counting on institutions to adhere to the same superstitions as the plebs. They may well use them against us though to shake coins out, much like Columbus predicting the eclipse...

Probably no maybe about it given what we've seen from JPM this past week.

I guess bear markets are a thing of the past /s

Either way I am good, long or short, more sats will be stacked