Thanks for sharing.

Interesting parallel you draw between, essentially, the economics of the British Crown's rule over the American colonies and the economics of Ordinals and similar non-currency layers grafted onto Bitcoin.

The Crown had high and essentially fixed costs that made it brittle in the face of an imperfect economic boycott.

I don't know much about the market for Ordinals, but I doubt it is remotely as vulnerable from a cost point of view.

Boycotts of Ordinals would drive up their costs only minimally as long as a small but meaningful percentage of hashing power does not participate in the boycott.

A boycott might more easily add considerable uncertainty to their settlement time, however, since it is essentially impossible to predict when a (presumably minority) Ordinal-friendly pool will find the next block.