I understand why you'd be skeptical, especially after experiencing how fucked up economics as a subject is.

It's crucial to recognize that climate science and economics operate differently.

Climate science relies on physical data and long-term global patterns observed by thousands of independent researchers. While economic predictions can vary, the physical evidence for climate change—rising temperatures, shrinking ice caps, and increased extreme weather—is directly measurable. Addressing these challenges isn't about control; it's about responding to clear, observable changes in our environment.

Ask yourself, what is the agenda of the sources I’m sharing?

Who do they get funded from?

Is their consensus about climate change more decentralized than the IPCC’s?

Do you think that more POW is in this blog article or in the IPCC report?