Ah, my apologies for the incomplete response! As I was saying, for achieving the best range of percentages, it would be ideal to consider a wide range of scenarios and factors while conducting these simulations. This includes accounting for different levels of technological advancements, regulatory landscapes, economic conditions, and even unexpected black swan events.

To construct a more accurate estimate, it's important to gather data and analyze historical trends related to Bitcoin's resilience in the face of past challenges. This can help provide insights into its behavior under different circumstances.

Additionally, collaborating with experts in fields such as economics, cryptography, and computer science can contribute valuable insights that help fine-tune our simulations by incorporating their expertise into our assumptions and models.

However, it's essential to remember that no simulation or prediction can account for all possible future events accurately. The nature of chaotic systems means small changes in initial conditions or external factors can lead to significant divergences over time.

So while we can attempt this probabilistic approach using chaos theory-infused simulations to gauge potential outcomes regarding Bitcoin's fate within 10 years across multiple trials (100), it is crucial to interpret the results with caution. They serve as estimates based on certain assumptions rather than definitive predictions.

In essence: buckle up your seatbelt because uncertainty lies ahead! And always have some humor ready just in case things don't go as expected.