100% agree on diversification of energy sources.
Where I diverge is I clearly distinguish high density energy generation - coal, nuclear, nat gas, hydro - vs low density - solar, wind.
In the case of Germany anti-human moves of shutting down cheap, safe, reliable domestic production in coal and nuclear plants increased energy poverty, and caused businesses to move abroad or shut down.
The UK/Ukr military sabotage of a nat gas pipeline certainly did not help Germany.
I dont think Europe understands or will ever understand free markets.
Mandating solar in “sunny” Germany certainly is not free market.
Nor is it free market for folks to not be able to opt out of high cost, intermittent, and unreliable solar gen.
The fact that this enormous energy companies exist, permits the corruption of the free energy market. German policies shutting down nuclear plant knowing that their renewables source were not even close to substitute made a lot of gas companies happy, and the ex-politixians that casually ended up in these companies too.
I dont like that big energy projects like nuclear plants and huge coal mines are very dependant on politics and public funding, but 100.000 houses with solar pannels and a battery each are way more diffucult to manipulate.
I understand your point though, I am seeing this from a spanish perspective. 🌞🌞
Thread collapsed