I'm not defending core, I'm just simply acknowledging that from a technical perspective core arguments are better since most of the people who support core are developers, whereas knots arguments tend to be emotionally focused about "CSAM", and "Spam", instead of discussing how they want to enable more control over their own nodes.

The three scenarios that play out.

1. Bitcoin Filters work good, and transactions can be Censored, and stopped.

2. Bitcoin filters don't work well, and malicious data transactions still get through.

3. Bitcoin is a Permissionless system where data, and monetary transactions have to compete for space in block via the fee market.

I support Fee Markets naturally pricing out malicious activity.

nostr:nevent1qqszmeve2vkq3knprrtf3pmr7068fyuax2nalpmkqlzxw5daqvpfhjspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuetcd96zuur4vghsygrh743y82py6gjh87m4th2jcu7pfxrdzhqvnpgj6305m6cga8u8ngpsgqqqqqqsl24mr2

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Really?

How many times one should tell you?

- "After Bitcoin SV (BSV) Node developers and miners lifted the OP_Return data size limits to 100KB, activity immediately took off as users started posting texts, videos and even pictures. Unfortunately, among these posts was apparently (not yet confirmed) a piece of illegal content involving alleged child exploitation material, The Next Web reported."

Your BS propaganda is disgusting.

Also this:

nostr:nevent1qqs2dkdkd44tmnezesgsywxqsmn59facl6vw4qks4kxrunutk7kwj9cppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgkwaehxw309ahx7um5wfjkc6t5v4ejummjvuhs5438tq

Keyword Apparently.

Until it happens on Bitcoin "Core" that argument is effectively pointless, and the current iteration of knots wouldn't stop it either 😑.