Idk. I felt like he tried to steel man the alternative view. In general he also seemed to try and give the other side the benefit of the doubt. I’ve listened to A LOT of these conversations and this is the only one where I felt like one side wasn’t just calling the other side retards or simply setting up straw men to knock down
Thought the opposite tbh. nostr:nprofile1qqsvak4cr0jzaarahhn98a9602e94sa2xt8u9dnjac8cns86lzp0z0spzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj7sprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujummjv9hxwetsd9kxctnyv4mqhehqxh seemed influenced by own incentives, stuck in technical mindset, offered no opinion on Bitcoin as money and how to protect that.
Sounded like he cared sweet fuk all about the little guy who wants to run a node and contribute to the network, or doesn’t have enough Bitcoin to play futures bets with him. And nostr:nprofile1qqsd0uazmzmhwseeym3rjhf3txyjapreapc6sq8yq8cy07cg45tlx2cpp4mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7tcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhst99y68 soft-cocked his way around opportunities to challenge or focus on the real issue at hand: Bitcoin as money.
Discussion
His culture war take was a bit of a joke.. School-of-post-17 wanting to argue out of boredom from price action, c’mon 🤷🏼♂️
This is a big deal for some, and it’s triggering to hear “OGs” brush it off like that.
That part I didn’t agree with either. But it can be difficult to understand why people feel passionate about something when they don’t. So in that respect it was just a poor question.
