This. If a bank wanted to hold $1M in BTC, they’d also have to hold $1M in USD. Because volatility, risky, etc etc.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Is that true? Wouldn’t holding the bitcoin itself satisfactory?

Probably depends on how it is insured. If it is FDIC then no. I agree, there really shouldn't be an issue. But in a world where dollars are expected it is still difficult.

Dollar banking is still by far the dominant form. That won't change quickly.

Gotcha. I don’t think banks should bank bitcoin. They can get in to a new business of custodianship.

There will be a range of different models which are tried. Just not quite yet, although we are getting closer.

That *was* the rule. Now they don’t *also* need to hold that $1M USD.