To make my stance clear, I execrate Soros more than anyone else in the world. Due to Soros' money games against Asia, my country once experienced an unprecedented economic crisis, and I couldn't graduate from university because my parents couldn't afford the tuition. And now, his henchman is sitting as the Secretary of the Treasury.

However, I think that someone who used the invaded country to promote Starlink and appear as a righteous hero to the public, only to eventually reveal his true colors, is ultimately no different from Soros.

Thanks to the Ukraine War, Starlink managed to rapidly expand its global influence, bestowing tremendous power on its CEO. But I am not on Ukraine's side either. Before the war, Ukraine was as corrupt and problematic as Russia.

I just believe that, under no circumstances, should supporting or tolerating invading nations be considered acceptable in the 21st century.

I cannot agree with any actions that threaten humanity's ongoing peace and democracy.

Regardless of context, full responsibility must be solely imposed on the nation that launches an invasion FIRST in order to achieve effects similar to the MAD.

Actually, that is a well-known international rule, but the bully government is deliberately ignoring it.

Simply, one side is an ATM of the far-left, and the other is an ATM of the far-right. And I extremely despise extreme political factions.

Immense wealth grants immense power, once holding such power, people tend to succumb to corruption to maintain it and it seems to be one of the vile aspects of human nature. This is why I detest the following-follower system as well. It grants power online and creates a hierarchical pyramid among equal users. Just as people are judged by wealth, it makes them judged by the number of followers. It disrupts focusing on the topic you want to talk about.

I know you are following me and that you’re not a bot, but I apologize for not following back. Please understand my principles. 🙏