Rejection of centralised platforms; their seemingly arbitrary or idealogy-based controls and over-exploitation of users.
That's why I've found my way to Nostr.
Rejection of centralised platforms; their seemingly arbitrary or idealogy-based controls and over-exploitation of users.
That's why I've found my way to Nostr.
The two reasons are aligned.
People giving up power to corporations, and allowing them the role of filtering speech, isn't illegal and isn't strictly speaking a political problem, but it does erode democracy.
It doesn't mean, morally, that centralized platforms *ought* to be neutral and have permissive policies (although some choose to do so). You can make the argument none owes anyone the tool to exercise fundamental rights, so long as they aren't actively infringing them without their consent.
However, it'd be nice, and healthy for democracy, if people did have a tool to exercise their fundamental human right to freedom of speech, which is neutral and not subject to the will of the owners of corporations or capitalistic interests.
That's Nostr.
It doesn't remove governmental censorship, but it does a lot of good to freedom of speech and can be a tool for democracy.