this is something ive wondered for a while. ignoring temperature and pressure dynamics, as well as error rates (which again should seem to come consistently) i can only speculate.
maybe some numbers are harder than others to hash resulting in a disparity of time?
or some dustbunny or crud affecting airflow?
do immersed miners perform more consistently than air cooled?
is a period background process on the miner firmware consuming too much compute or memory and creating a bottleneck in capture or reporting?
more research is warrented here for efficiency.
