Cake - The Distance
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=JH6il8U3EU0
WordAll #707 completed in 1m 14s
🟩🟩❌🟩🟩
wordall.xyz
Wordle 978 2/6* (doesn't count)
⬛🟩⬛⬛🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
https://www.nytimes.com/games/wordle/index.html
#Worldle #762 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
🧭⭐🚩🔤🗣️👫🪙📐
La palabra del día #777 6/6 (bicycle holder)
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Le Mot (@WordleFR) #774 5/6 (Heinie Mudkipz the best supply teacher in all of Luxembourg)
⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛
⬛🟩⬛⬛🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Framed #713 (nope. I watched The Great British Menu which is a cookery competition without most of the nonsense and artificial drama introduced by reality television. There are no reaction shots, obviously lots of insight shots, but nobody is talking about things as if they're happening now but recorded later. I think the lack of 'reality tv-ness' is aided by their been fixed locations with, in the broadest terms, fixed roles. There are three hour long episodes a week. Essentially they start with four, often extremely talented, chefs whom cook two courses per episode, for a four course banquet, they are individually scored by a renowned expert chef for each course and the person with the lowest score is eliminated. During episode three the two remaining chefs cook for a table of judges whom decide which chefs get through to the finals. It's a great show and I think the current judges (Tom Kerridge, Ed Gamble and Nisha Patel) are discerning without being dicks about it. We often want critics to be dicks about it because mostly, I think, when we eat something mediocre or not good we avoid it but are too polite to make too much of a fuss. We don't come back. So food critics fill the gap of what we'd say if we weren't bound by being polite or in a hurry. However with a show like this, even in the case of a food disaster, a person can see the effort that went into something therefore the norms we expect from critics are somehow subverted, and the criticism is mostly constructive but accurate.)
🎥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥