I think Kaspa has good fundamentals with a proof of work model, no pre-mine, fixed supply and decentralized model for transaction validation and mining. The node storage capacity requirements are a little hefty but not unmanageable. The centralization risk of the protocol is somewhat of a concern. But for those with unlimited choice and limited disposable income for asset investments, BTC is the better choice IMO. I think KAS has a high likelihood of trending to zero vs BTC because it is a relative late comer. I don’t think it will ever achieve escape velocity as an enduring $1T+ market cap asset soon enough (or ever) to be relevant as a long term store of value. BTC has too much of a head start. If such a small portion of society has adopted Bitcoin, even with its high profile and its adoption by huge asset managers and nation states, KAS is a pretty hard sell to anyone but frequency traders. And to me it’s just not that sexy. There can be only one.