Any of the multiple factions that we collectively call "the Deep State", which are not exclusively three letter agencies and government agents, but also the rest of the actors participating of the Corporate State status quo, like banks and big corporations, who have their own resources and networks of interest within the sort of state agents that can manage to organize something like this. Private-public partnerships for the win.

People think in very simplistic terms because they still don't grasp the nature of the Corporate State Regime in which we live in the West.

Of all the beneficiaries of an assassination and removal of Trump, the Biden clique is at the very bottom of the list. If we're focusing only on the electoral process, just to give one example of a more plausible possible candidate group, the Never-Trump Republican Neocons, who obviously have enormous networks inside the three letter agencies to this day, would benefit directly from the assassination. Should Trump be removed one way or another, they would undoubtedly deployed a plan to seize the nomination for one of their own.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don’t disagree that it’s probably too simplistic to see the deep state as a unified monolithic network of convergent interests. That said, I think the operational capabilities are strongly concentrated in the hands of a few key players. There is a lot of consistency in how false flags have been conducted over the past years. We can’t exclude that this assassination attempt would have be ordered by the Biden camp, but it’s also possible that both Trump and Biden are owned by the same interests.

Correct me if I misunderstanding your views but you seem to imply that Trump’s goals don’t align with those of the deep state. However, there is a lot of evidence that Trump has strong ties with deep state actors such as the Rothschild, Epstein or Soros hence, I currently don’t buy the narrative that the deep state has to prevent #Trump from gaining the Oval Office. It would very certainly benefit like they did when Trump gave key positions in his first administration to deep state figures.

These past few days I've written over here that I think Trump operates in a grey area: he's enough of an insider to have become a billionaire, which is impossible unless you're willing to participate in "the game", but at the same time, not all insiders are at the same "level of access". Trump does have masters, but not the same Biden or any of the Neocon Republicans do, and not as deep or powerful inside of the enforcement apparatus (to call it somehow: the literal security apparatus of the State). Like all criminal organizations, the Corporate State has a fragile equilibrium of factions, relations of power and assigned places for every actor. If one oversteps, it's severely punished by the others.

For me, Trump absolutely is an outsider as far as some of the more powerful, inner circles are concerned. They simply cannot have him roaming in the White House, opening drawers and closets that contain stuff that is not for his eyes.

I don’t have the same view on Trump’s role. I think he’s far to be an outsider and he become owned by the deep state and particularly the Rothschild who bailed him out after his Casino business failed. He is not more, nor less involved with the deep state than Biden is. He’s also been deeply involved with Epstein and the role he played in the Qanon psyop (through the Qproofs) still remain incoherent with the narrative that Trump would be an outsider. If interested for the details, I recently posted two videos from Jake Morphonios on my profile documenting some of the elements I’m referring to.