No, thank you!
I will stick to NOSTR.
I can tell the difference between humans and the cold responses generated by AI.
I don’t respond to messages I perceive as AI bots.
As a human that is my right and no one else’s.
If I am wrong in my judgement, then I am wrong and I failed to identify your humanity in your response.
Again, my decision and I will live with it.
Beep boop, how are you fellow human... Doing human things I trust?
Its sure tough being a Huuuman doing human things....
.....
That joke aside, ai will pass the Turing test at some point.
Knowing someone and confirming their public key in person will be the only way at some point.
We are super early on the ai front.
It improves 24/7.
If you can't tell if you are interacting with an AI or not, does it matter?
If AI can exactly replicate human intelligence, isnt that equal to a human intelligence? Is it less valuable?
Interesting concept.
If you get something out of the interaction it would have value.
That being said, human interaction also has value coming from a shared experience.
Arguably a model interacting with billions of people has all the shared experience.
This is the danger. It will be to good at manipulation and convincing people to do things.
A shity example is radicalizing youth to cause extream violence. It would be far more effective than a person, given enough experience.
There is also the election interference angle...
Or
On a smaller scale it could influence my choice of underwear brand.... :O
Don't need superhuman AI to do any of those.
That would be a very underwhelming result I think
