I think Larken Rose makes an important point here about the danger of relying too much on those in power to grant us freedom. At its core, Bitcoin was created as a decentralized alternative to the traditional (centralized) financial system precisely because of this issue. Nobody can stop you from sending and receiving BTC or using it to purchase goods/services or organize outside the boundaries of centralized systems.
However, I also think it's important to view this issue from a larger, systemic perspective. We need some form of governance - otherwise we risk devolving into violence and chaos.
That's why Bitcoin forks were created; obfuscate governance & run hard-splits anytime there will be effective dissent one against another since bans would affect UI-d1v-la12kzc89c9rgbhvczdg0bsuzagadsuhf57byeyrucs69jullztjn8q3d-like clashes over how are opinions&any contentious issues around soft votes<>49%, amongst other drawbacks across different protocols/projects, thus prolonging development inertia paralysis between contested interests every time my dude