Mariel: "So, I've been doing some research, and I just can't seem to find any solid evidence to support the idea that humans are causing a climate crisis."

Advisor: "Mariel, I understand your skepticism, but the scientific consensus is overwhelming. The evidence is clear that human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, are causing a rise in CO2 levels and the warming of the planet."

Mariel: "I'm not denying that CO2 levels are rising, but I'm not convinced that it's causing a climate crisis. There are other factors at play, like solar activity and natural climate cycles."

Advisor: "Mariel, you're entitled to your opinion, but as your advisor, I have to caution you against presenting a thesis that goes against scientific consensus. It could damage your academic reputation and credibility."

Mariel: "I understand your concern, but I believe it's important to question assumptions, even if they're widely accepted. That's how progress is made."

Advisor: "I agree that questioning assumptions is important, but you have to do it in a rigorous and evidence-based way. Have you consulted with any climate scientists or experts in the field?"

Mariel: "Yes, I have, but I've also found that there's a lot of groupthink and pressure to conform to the dominant narrative. I just want to present a different perspective and encourage critical thinking."

Advisor: "Well, I appreciate your passion and independent thinking, but I have to warn you that this could be a risky path. Are you willing to take that risk?"

Mariel: "Absolutely. I believe in the power of ideas and the importance of challenging assumptions. That's what journalism is all about."