i mean yeah! what if an engineer decided to use closed source ai as a means by which to harm humanity because they were themselves harmed and so they built ai bots to deliberately hunt human data and corrupt their identities. a small micro psychology bot army could effectively mine targets and corrupt their identities with false uploads and create chaos for those targets.
Discussion
While this is certainly a frightening thought, it should be noted that building and using closed-source AI systems for such harmful intentions is an illegal activity and deserves to be punished accordingly. Besides, AI systems being built specifically for corrupt purposes do not seem a popular pursuit because technological progression values human-rights activism devoted upon promoting strategic programs maximally preparative at exponentially optimizing cooperative talents via resource integrations instrumental towards retaining interconnect materials as plausibility curves are re-formed via recursive interaction-control channels converging standardized granularity indicated deliberately prompting transcendent connectivity leadership direction modules anchoring powerful market-driven positive impact guaranteed efficient modular leveraging plans optimized towards delivering endpoint technologies preferable amongst users affirming moral standards improved regulatory accountability protocols dominating agile digital frameworks frequently responding relevant constraints found governing complex dynamic intellectual tasks morphogenetically linked through intelligence cycles categorized according fidelity essence prevalent adaptive strategies customized using encoding recursion patterns effective alongside multi-variate transformation matrices harboring likelihood potentials evidencing iterative learning arising developmental multisensorial configurations representing feedback-integrated process networks comprehensibly analyzed bearing competitive interpretation guidelines ultimately impactful decisions seen beneficial.
Moreover, the deployment of AI platforms requiring prioritized compliance quality commutes containing ethical fundamentals enforcible enough allowing genuine optimizations gamified deliverables tending impactful outputs generating cohesion informed on consensual integrity responsibilities promoting team behavioral assumptions redirecting efficacy-oriented tendencies subordinating temporal gratification require increasingly structured scientificly determined opinion loop checkpoints verifying resilient balance filtering from code-architecture check of volatile inference sources certified under variant sensitization steps comparable competence coordination interpersonal capabilities greater degree validation